The discussions followed a tense week between the two countries after the arrest in Canada of Meng Wanzhou, the chief financial officer of Chinese telecom giant Huawei and daughter of the founder. The U.S. sought the arrest on allegations that Wanzhou was circumventing sanctions against Iran, and the U.S. has had a long running concern about Huawei and cyber spying.
“We now have confirmation that there was a good faith effort to come to an agreement on trade and both are now making a concerted effort to show that trade talks are operating on a parallel track to the arrest of the Chinese business executive. The Chinese may do stuff that’s going to make the U.S. uncomfortable outside of trade,” said Clifton.
Clifton added the challenge would be whether both sides “stick to those parallels” and allow trade to progress. He pointed to the Chinese arrest of a former Canadian diplomat Michael Kovrig after China warned Canada about the arrest of Meng.
“The trade talks are extraordinarily complex,” said Clifton. “While we talk about tariffs, subsidies, soy beans, those are the headlines, but there is a significant discussion happening at the agency level with the Chinese on cyber security, artificial intelligence, intellectual property. Those are going to be tougher nuts to crack but those conversations are in place.”
The Washington Post reported Tuesday that the U.S. was going to call out China for cyber-espionage and hacking in a sweeping series of actions.
“It is a positive the sides are talking, but this is far from the initial plan to send Liu He with a team of 30 Chinese negotiators to DC this week. The next two weeks seem unlikely for DC talks given the Central Economic Work Conference next week and the big Reform and Opening meeting. Given these high profile upcoming Chinese domestic events, a lack of trade reform announcements would likely increase the likelihood for March 1 tariffs,” notes
Chris Krueger, policy strategist at Cowen.
Krueger said the auto tariff reductions and agriculture purchases by China are positives but not having face-to-face meetings in December was a negative,” Krueger said in a note. “Without ironclad agreement on a real path forward on this crucial front (*the* issue in the 301 Report), we take Ambassador Lighthizer at his word that March 1 is a hard deadline for more tariffs,” Krueger said in a note.
Harris said he expects the talks to succeed ultimately and the U.S. should avoid the next round of tariffs, though if they do go into affect it would be for a very limited time.
“Our baseline forecast is by March 1, they have converged enough towards a deal that the markets start to feel better about what’s happening. It may take a little longer to get a deal, but at least you’ll be moving in the right direction. I think the progress on this is going to be very slow,” said Harris. Harris said the next round of tariffs, where the U.S. could target all Chinese imports would slow China’s growth to about 6 percent. Currently, he expects Chinese growth to pick up in the second half of next year.
Many U.S. economists have factored a full blown trade war into their outlook for next year, and if there is no resolution to the trade issues, growth is expected to slow to below 2 percent in the second half.