Mitt Romney’s Dilemma – Huffington Post
Mitt Romney was one of the most vocal — and most scathing — critics of Donald Trump during the campaign. He wasn’t afraid to say exactly what he thought of Trump, in no uncertain terms. Romney let it be known that he thought Trump was patently unqualified to lead the country, and he warned his fellow Republicans not to vote for such a charlatan. The voters didn’t listen, of course, but it’s pretty obvious what Romney thinks about Trump — and his election to the presidency has likely not changed Mitt’s opinion much at all. So to accept the job would mean working for the same man Romney was warning America about, not too long ago. Maybe Mitt could grow a beard and just give up shaving, so he wouldn’t have to face himself in the mirror every morning.
Secretary of State would be a perfect end to Romney’s career — if he were serving someone like Jeb Bush or Marco Rubio, that is. Romney has always seen himself as a statesman, so it’d be a perfect fit. He wouldn’t be in charge of anything to do with the economy, so his past career as a plutocrat wouldn’t even be an issue. But being in charge of foreign policy for an average Republican president isn’t what’s being offered. Instead, Romney would be Trump’s face to the world — and that comes with a whole lot of potential downsides.
Will Trump be surrounded with sober-minded people who will constrain his worst knee-jerk impulses? Or will he be tweeting freely about what he thinks of other countries, perhaps precipitating international incidents by doing so? No one, at this point, can tell. But the possibility certainly exists. Which would leave Romney the job of continually cleaning up avoidable messes. Or worse.
How would Donald Trump take America to war? That’s also a very real possibility. If this comes to pass, his secretary of State will be the one who has to try to get allies to stand with us. If the reasons for going to war are seen as illegitimate (or vindictive, or petulant, or irrational, or whatever…), then that’s going to be a very hard sell. Trump may bear the blame for such a war, but the secretary of State will likely bear the blame if we wind up waging such a war unilaterally. The job will require a lot more reassurances and hand-holding than normal, that much (at least) seems certain.
So why would Romney even consider setting himself up in the rather unenviable position of attempting to explain Donald Trump’s thinking to world leaders? Romney obviously doesn’t have a shred of respect for Trump, but he’d be responsible for trying to build respect for Trump among the world’s leaders. That’s a pretty duplicitous position to put yourself in, to say the least.
Perhaps Romney could delude himself into thinking he’ll be able to control Trump, or at least steer him away from his worst impulses. If that’s the case, then Romney could convince himself that taking the job would be the highest form of public service — saving Trump from himself for the betterment of the country and the world. That’s a noble way to put it, but you could see Romney thinking along those lines. After all, if Romney is offered the job and doesn’t take it, Trump could easily name some hothead instead — which could lead to even more sticky situations. Romney could see himself saving America from such a fate, I suppose.