Cohen ordered to disclose client list by Monday

 In Politics

Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump's personal attorney, leaves Capitol Hill in Washington on Tuesday.

A federal prosecutor’s office says there will be a hearing Friday to address a temporary restraining order sought by President Donald Trump’s personal attorney, Michael Cohen. | Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP

Trump’s longtime personal attorney went to federal court to stop prosecutors from looking at materials seized in a recent FBI raid.


NEW YORK — Lawyers for President Donald Trump and his longtime personal attorney Michael Cohen went to court Friday trying to stop federal prosecutors from getting at private material — but wound up with a judge ordering them to disclose Cohen’s client list in public.

U.S. District Judge Kimba Wood on Friday ordered attorneys for Cohen to hand over a list of Cohen’s law clients and proof of their relationship by 10 a.m. Monday, so she can decide whether materials seized from Cohen’s office by federal law enforcement agents last week should be protected by attorney-client privilege.

Story Continued Below

That list will be a public record, Wood said, because the identities of an attorney’s clients are not subject to attorney-client privilege unless the mere name itself would reveal the kind of advice sought or given.

Wood’s order raises the possibility of further embarrassing disclosures involving Cohen, who is already at the center of a legal dispute involving adult-film actress Stormy Daniels, who is suing the president to void a nondisclosure agreement negotiated by Cohen concerning a sexual encounter Daniels says she had with Trump in 2006.

The Wall Street Journal has reported that Cohen was also involved last year in negotiating a $1.6 million payment to a Playboy Playmate who said she was impregnated by prominent Los Angeles investor and Republican fundraiser Elliott Broidy.

Cohen is among Trump’s most loyal aides and advisers, a lawyer who lives in one of Trump’s buildings and worked for the Trump Organization, where he rose to a level of seniority held by few outside Trump’s family.

FBI agents overseen by the U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan raided Cohen’s Rockefeller Center office, Park Avenue apartment, and a hotel room Cohen was using earlier this week, seizing documents, devices and other materials. Prosecutors said in court filings that Cohen is under criminal investigation, but no charges have been filed.

The raid triggered an immediate escalation in Trump’s war on special prosecutor Robert Mueller, whose probe into the Trump campaign’s collusion with Russia in the 2016 campaign has expanded to include questions of whether Trump or people close to him tried to obstruct justice.

The president subsequently complained about the raid during a White House meeting, at which he told reporters that agents “broke into the office of one of my personal attorneys.”

The president later tweeted “A TOTAL WITCH HUNT!!!” He added: “Attorney-client privilege is dead!”

Sometime prior to Monday’s physical searches of Cohen’s home, office and hotel room, investigators seized emails from “multiple different email accounts” maintained by Cohen, the new court filing revealed. Prosecutors suggested they had completed a review of potential attorney-client material in those accounts.

“The results of that review … indicate that Cohen is in fact performing little to no legal work, and that zero emails were exchanged with President Trump,” assistant U.S. attorney Thomas McKay and other prosecutors wrote.

Portions of a court filing detailing what potential offenses Cohen is being investigated over were blacked out of the copy the court made public, but prosecutors said the potential crimes involve “fraud and evidence of a lack of truthfulness.”

McKay and other government lawyers challenged Cohen’s claims of attorney-client privilege, saying his law practice was far from bustling.

“Cohen’s claim that he has confidential communications with multiple clients appears to be exaggerated. For example, Cohen has told at least one witness that he has only client — President Trump,” prosecutors wrote.

Government lawyers also suggested Trump’s lack of computer savvy makes it unlikely there are many emails from him.

“Cohen apparently rarely emailed with President Trump, and has identified no other clients with whom he has an attorney-client relationship,” they said.

Prosecutors said the files are unlikely to contain attorney-client communications with Trump about an alleged pre-election $130,000 hush money deal with adult film actress Stormy Daniels, since Trump claims he didn’t know about the payment.

“There is reason to doubt that even communications with his only publicly identified client regarding payments to Stephanie Clifford, who is also known as Stormy Daniels, would be protected by attorney-client privilege. Among other things, President Trump has publicly denied knowing that Cohen paid Clifford, and suggested to reporters that they had to ‘ask Michael’ about the payment,” the government lawyers wrote.

Prosecutors also suggested Cohen was exaggerating the significance of his affiliation with the prominent Washington legal and lobbying firm Squire Patton Boggs. Cohen and the firm announced a “strategic alliance” last year, but prosecutors say information they obtained from Squire Patton Boggs suggests the arrangement yielded little.

“A representative of the firm also advised … that for the duration of the Agreement, Cohen introduced a sum total of five clients to the firm,” prosecutors wrote.

After word of the search warrants emerged this week, the firm said it was cooperating with investigators and the arrangement with Cohen has ended. Prosecutors said the deal, which called for Cohen to receive $500,000 a year from the firm along with a percentage of fees charged, formally ended March 2.

Prosecutors argued that Cohen’s limited number of clients suggests that many of the records seized Monday, including information from a safe-deposit box, are unlikely to contain attorney-client communications. The government lawyers contend this distinguishes Cohen’s situation from another in New York in 2002, in which a judge did require a court-appointed special master to sift through files seized from the office of well-known criminal defense attorney Lynne Stewart.

Stewart had numerous clients facing prosecution by the U.S. attorney’s office, while Cohen isn’t a criminal defense lawyer, prosecutors noted.

Recent Posts
Get Breaking News Delivered to Your Inbox
Join over 2.3 million subscribers. Get daily breaking news directly to your inbox as they happen.
Your Information will never be shared with any third party.
Get Latest News in Facebook
Never miss another breaking news. Click on the "LIKE" button below now!