OPEC should heed lessons from Achnacarry Agreement: Kemp – Reuters

 In Business

LONDON OPEC members are struggling to protect their revenues in the face of renewed competition from U.S. shale producers and other suppliers outside the organization.

OPEC’s revenues from petroleum exports have fallen to just $446 billion in 2016 from $1.2 trillion in 2012 (“Annual Statistical Bulletin”, OPEC, 2017).

But past experience strongly suggests OPEC’s effort to stabilize oil inventories and prices while protecting its market share will fail.

Since the beginning of the modern petroleum industry, periods of high prices and concern about supplies running out have alternated with episodes of low prices and oversupply.

High prices and concerns about availability normally trigger an exploration boom and rapid innovations in drilling and production technology as well as efforts to use oil more efficiently.

The resulting increase in production and a slowdown in consumption growth creates conditions for a subsequent slump.

The basic narrative has not changed since the first oil well was drilled in 1859, with periods of oversupply (1900s, 1930s, 1950s and 1990s) alternating with panics about shortages (1910s, 1970s, 2000s).

The current oversupply and slump in prices has its roots in the panic about peak oil and soaring prices in the middle of the last decade.

High prices between 2004 and 2014 spurred an exploration boom around the world as well as the widespread deployment of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing techniques in the United States.

At the same time, the cost of oil led to renewed interest among governments, businesses and consumers in greater oil efficiency and alternative energy technologies including renewables and electric vehicles.

The slump which followed was inevitable as were the subsequent calls for more coordination among producers to cut output, reduce excess stocks and boost prices.


Every slump prompts calls for more coordination, restrictions on production and the stabilization of market shares (“Crude volatility: the history and the future of boom-bust oil prices”, McNally, 2017).

The most notorious was the secret agreement reached between Standard Oil of New Jersey (forerunner of Exxon), Royal Dutch-Shell and the Anglo-Persian Oil Company (forerunner of BP) in September 1928.

Walter Teagle, president of Standard Oil, John Cadman, chairman of Anglo-Persian, and Henri Deterding, managing director of Royal Dutch-Shell, met at Deterding’s rented castle in the Highlands of Scotland.

Afterwards, all Teagle would say was that “Sir John Cadman … and myself were guests of Sir Henri Deterding and Lady Deterding at Achnacarry for the grouse shooting, and while the game was a primary object of the visit, the problem of the world’s petroleum industry naturally came in for a great deal of discussion.”

In fact the three men had reached a secret deal under which they would accept their current share of the oil market and not seek to increase it at the expense of the others.

A draft, which seems to have been adopted without alterations, is reproduced in the official history of BP (“The History of the British Petroleum Company”, Volume 2, Bamberg, 1994).

The Achnacarry Agreement, also called the “As-Is” agreement because its attempted to stabilize the status quo, is worth studying because of the close parallels with the current situation in the oil market.


Fears about shortages during the World War One and subsequent worries about the depletion of U.S. oilfields in the post-war period had caused real oil prices to more than double from $15 per barrel in 1915 to $37 in 1920.

The result was an exploration boom and a subsequent slump in prices, which had fallen to just $19 by 1923, and remained depressed through the rest of the decade, even before the onset of the Great Depression after 1929.

“Since its inception the oil industry has looked forward with apprehension to the gradual depletion and final exhaustion of its supplies of crude oil,” the preamble to the Achnacarry Agreement explained.

“The temporary shortage of supplies that existed in certain countries during the great war further accentuated this fear and caused vast sums of good money to be expended to locate and develop reserves in all parts of the world where petroleum potentialities appeared, as well as accumulating large reserve stocks above ground.”

“Now the situation has changed. An adequate supply for a long time to come is assured. This is the result of the application of science to the petroleum industry.”

Recent Posts
Get Breaking News Delivered to Your Inbox
Join over 2.3 million subscribers. Get daily breaking news directly to your inbox as they happen.
Your Information will never be shared with any third party.
Get Latest News in Facebook
Never miss another breaking news. Click on the "LIKE" button below now!